Kammerer S Law Of Seriality In Art

'Coincide' redirects here. For the album by Dewey Redman, see. A coincidence is a remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances which have no apparent causal connection with each other. The perception of remarkable coincidences may lead to,, or claims. Or it may lead to belief in, which is a doctrine that events will happen in the exact manner of a predetermined plan. From a perspective, coincidences are inevitable and often less remarkable than they may appear intuitively. An example is the, which shows that the of two persons having the same birthday already exceeds 50% in a group of only 23 persons.

Contents • • • • • • • Etymology [ ] The first known usage of the word is from c. 1605 with the meaning 'exact correspondence in substance or nature' from the French coincidence, from coincider, from Medieval Latin coincidere. The definition evolved in the 1640s as 'occurrence or existence during the same time', and again in the writings of Sir Thomas Browne as 'a concurrence of events with no apparent connection' around the 1680s. Microsoft Report Viewer Winforms 11.0.0.0. As synchronicity [ ] Swiss psychiatrist developed a theory which states that remarkable coincidences occur because of what he called ',' which he defined as an 'acausal connecting principle.' The theory of 'synchronicity', conceived by a physicist and a psychologist, both eminent in their fields, represents perhaps the most radical departure from the world-view of mechanistic science in our time.

Yet they had a precursor, whose ideas had a considerable influence on Jung: the Austrian biologist, a wild who committed suicide in 1926, at the age of forty-five. Arthur Koestler, One of Kammerer's passions was collecting coincidences. He published a book titled Das Gesetz der Serie ( The Law of Series), which has not been translated into English.

On the Metaphysics of Seriality in 'Dexter' and Kammerer (S. But not to be analysed in terms of his trauma, can be compared to the aesthetics as well as the philosophical quandaries of Paul Kammerer's Law of the Series, a metaphysical exaltation of seriality as a principle for cultural studies as well as scientific research.

Hd Tune Pro Full Crack Download there. In this book he recounted 100 or so anecdotes of coincidences that had led him to formulate his theory of seriality. He postulated that all events are connected by waves of seriality. Kammerer was known to make notes in public parks of how many people were passing by, how many of them carried umbrellas, etc. Called the idea of seriality 'interesting and by no means absurd.' [ ] Carl Jung drew upon Kammerer's work in his book Synchronicity.

A coincidence lacks an apparent causal connection. A coincidence may be synchronicity, that being the experience of events which are causally unrelated, and yet their occurrence together has meaning for the person who observes them. To be counted as synchronicity, the events should be unlikely to occur together by chance, but this is questioned because there is usually a chance, no matter how small. Some skeptics (e.g., and ) perceive synchronicity as merely an instance of. They say that probability and statistics theorems (such as ) suffice to explain remarkable coincidences.

Compiled hundreds of accounts of interesting coincidences and anomalous phenomena. Causality [ ] Measuring the of a series of coincidences is the most common method of distinguishing a coincidence from causally connected events.

The mathematically naive person seems to have a more acute awareness than the specialist of the basic paradox of probability theory, over which philosophers have puzzled ever since Pascal initiated that branch of science [in 1654]. The paradox consists, loosely speaking, in the fact that probability theory is able to predict with uncanny precision the overall outcome of processes made up out of a large number of individual happenings, each of which in itself is unpredictable. In other words, we observe a large number of uncertainties producing a certainty, a large number of chance events creating a lawful total outcome. Arthur Koestler, To establish cause and effect (i.e., ) is notoriously difficult, as is expressed by the commonly heard statement that '.' In, it is generally accepted that observational studies can give hints but can never establish cause and effect.

But, considering the probability paradox (see Koestler's quote above), it appears that the larger the set of coincidences, the more certainty increases and the more it appears that there is some cause behind a remarkable coincidence. It is only the manipulation of uncertainty that interests us. We are not concerned with the matter that is uncertain. Thus we do not study the mechanism of rain; only whether it will rain., 'The Philosophy of Statistics,' (Series D, 2000) It is no great wonder if in long process of time, while takes her course hither and thither, numerous coincidences should spontaneously occur.,, vol. II, 'Sertorius' See also [ ] • • • • • • • References [ ]. • Mathis, Frank H.

'A Generalized Birthday Problem'. Carl Review..

33 (2): 265–70..... • Etymonline. Archived from the original on 6 December 2016. Retrieved 6 December 2016. Missing or empty title= () CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown () • Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 6 December 2016.

Retrieved 6 December 2016. Missing or empty title= () CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown () • Oxford Dictionary. Archived from the original on 6 December 2016. Retrieved 6 December 2016.

Missing or empty title= () CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown () • Jung, Carl (1973). Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle (first Princeton/Bollingen paperback ed.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.. The Roots of Coincidence (hardcover ed.). Random House. The Roots of Coincidence (hardcover ed.).

Random House. • Robert Todd Carroll, 2012, • Charpak, Georges; Henri Broch (2004). Debunked!: ESP, telekinesis, and other pseudoscience.

Holland (trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. • David Lane & Andrea Diem Lane, 2010,, www.integralworld.net • (1972). The Roots of Coincidence (hardcover ed.). Random House.

– 1973 Vintage paperback: Bibliography [ ] •:. Pp. 227–46 • (2016). Fluke: The Maths and Myths of Coincidences, London: Oneworld Publications. External links [ ] Look up in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Wikiquote has quotations related to: •, nephiliman.com (web.archive.org) •, Austin Society to Oppose Pseudoscience •, UnderstandingUncertainty.org •, University of Cambridge Statslab • •.